[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3EBD5C27.7080001@brvenik.com>
From: security at brvenik.com (Jason)
Subject: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign
Georgi Guninski wrote:
> I am not an expert, but AFAIK at some time the key issuer have your
> *private* key because they issue the key. I am not comfortable someone
> else having my private key no matter if they claim they don't keep it.
>
> Georgi
>
Not in the normal operations of PKI. Briefly, in the classic case the
private key is generated at the requesting system and a public key is
sent to the issuing authority as a cdertificate signing request for
signing. The issuing authority does some validation of stuff and then
returns the public key in the form of a signed certificate. This
prevents tampering of the contents of the complete certificate by
providing a signature created with the private key of the issuer, the
public key of the issuer can then be used to verify this signature.
There are implementations that will do key escrow and they are all about
being able to recover intellectual properties by the legal owners in the
case that the encrypting authority (user) refuses or is unable to
provide them. Basically this is for corporations that have PKI and use
it to recover from any number of cases that can make it impossible for
an employee to decrypt information. Examples would be a car accident
that takes the life of the employee or termination...
In this case there are safeguards that are implemented to ensure that
the recovery of a key is only possible when justified. It is the
equivalent of aligning the stars and planets correctly and then proving
that there is a true eclipse even though it should not be happening.
-J
Powered by blists - more mailing lists