full-disclosure - In regards to recent crap flooding list.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1054519538.2235.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: mosten at bleepyou.com (Michael Osten)
Subject: In regards to recent crap flooding list.

On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 13:23, Perriero, Robert A. wrote:
> To all:
> I am by no means a professional security researcher, but it is hard to 
> find a list where full disclosure is allowed that isn't biased in some 
> way, either through anal moderators or corporate bias. That said, the 
> flood of literal "crap" that I have been getting in my inbox of late 
> from a select group of people from this list is unacceptable to me.

Having a unmoderated list means that it is a unmoderated list.  Make up
your mind, do you want moderation, or just moderation of the discussions
you think are crap?  Yes, the question was rhetorical.  You have two
options, stop whining, or unsubscribe.