full-disclosure - Zone Alarm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DA43D098C9A52441934D508B55E7AAC604F17229@msnaex10.usi.net>
From: joe at jthnet.com (Joe Hummel)
Subject: Zone Alarm

I would agree with morning_wood - hardware routers are a much better way to
go - when the device fails, you fail closed, as opposed to a software
solution, where if it fails, you fail open (read - open=vulnerable).  In
addition, I've found that even the technically savvy get perplexed by some
of the alerts generated by personal firewall software.  

My personal experience in my home lab - 

The Linksys products worked very well, and I had mine running for 3 years
without a failure (that wasn't caused by my ISP), but I recently upgraded to
a Netgear model (FR114P) and saw a slight increase in throughput, both
externally and internally.  In addition, the Netgear provides additional
features such as logging, better rule creation, and alerts to a SYSLOG
device.  Note, that the Netgear model is about twice as much as the typical
Linksys models (mine cost ~$100).  
______________________________
Joe Hummel

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of morning_wood
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:20 PM
To: Ben Tyson-Norrman; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm

buy a $40 hardware router. Software firewalls are not a security solution
IMHO.

morning_wood

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ben  <mailto:ben@...waytv.co.uk> Tyson-Norrman 
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:53 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm

I'm not sure I can ask this question without derision, but here goes... 

Zone Alarm, is it really as crap as everyone makes out.... or is the usual
posturing by ill-informed...? 

Many thanks all 

Visit our web site @ www.twowaytv.com 
This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named
recipient(s) only and may be confidential, legally privileged and protected
by law. If you are not a named addressee or have received this transmission
in error, please notify us immediately at postmaster@...waytv.co.uk and then
delete this e-mail. As Internet communications are not secure we do not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or
responsibility for any change made to this message after the original sender
sent it.  Save for this legal notice, the contents or opinions contained
within this e-mail are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily
represent those of Two Way TV Ltd unless otherwise specifically stated. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6220 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030604/dd568da9/winmail.bin