full-disclosure - AW: Zone Alarm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2gdghPw3q0GMjLpwXYiQDsKAAAAQAAAAZlxJgoMtRk+TT5vki9UiCAEAAAAA@intract.org>
From: ml at intract.org (Michael Linke)
Subject: AW: Zone Alarm

There is one big benefit, which no hardware router can bring you. Zone alarm
and other Windows based Software Firewalls can block network access for
programs. A HW firewall can only block a whole machine but can't denied
access for one software and allow access for another software on the same
machine. 




intract - any business anywhere
Michael Linke
Netzwerkadministrator
Heilbronnerstr. 50
D-73728 Esslingen
Germany
Phone  : +49 384 16297 50
Fax????  : +49 711 35152 89
mobile  : +49 178 51 52 959
e-mail?  : ml@...ract.org
ICQ      : 141033973
webside:?? http://www.intract.org


> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure-
> admin@...ts.netsys.com] Im Auftrag von Jason
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2003 20:53
> An: morning_wood
> Cc: Ben Tyson-Norrman; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> 
> Unfortunately the $40 'hardware' devices are not either.
> 
> Please reference the excellent work by Core
> http://www1.corest.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=276&idxseccion=10
> 
> and the _much_ more expensive 'hardware' devices are just as prone
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/pix-multiple-vuln-pub.shtml
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/pixfirewall-authen-flood-pub.shtml
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-regression-
> pub.shtml
> ...
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/advisory.html
> 
> For a personal solution Zone Alarm is quite possibly more adequate and
> appropriate.
> 
> morning_wood wrote:
> 
> >Zone Alarmbuy a $40 hardware router. Software firewalls are not a
> security solution IMHO.
> >
> >morning_wood
> >  ----- Original Message -----
> >  From: Ben Tyson-Norrman
> >  To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> >  Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:53 AM
> >  Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm
> >
> >
> >  I'm not sure I can ask this question without derision, but here goes...
> >
> >  Zone Alarm, is it really as crap as everyone makes out.... or is the
> usual posturing by ill-informed...?
> >
> >  Many thanks all
> >
> >  Visit our web site @ www.twowaytv.com
> >  This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named
> recipient(s) only and may be confidential, legally privileged and
> protected by law. If you are not a named addressee or have received this
> transmission in error, please notify us immediately at
> postmaster@...waytv.co.uk and then delete this e-mail. As Internet
> communications are not secure we do not accept legal responsibility for
> the contents of this message or responsibility for any change made to this
> message after the original sender sent it.  Save for this legal notice,
> the contents or opinions contained within this e-mail are solely those of
> the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Two Way TV Ltd unless
> otherwise specifically stated.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html