full-disclosure - public comment period for the Draft Security Vulnerability Reporting and Responding Process (OISAFETY)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3EDF10B5.6080300@guninski.com>
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: public comment period for the Draft Security
 Vulnerability Reporting and Responding Process (OISAFETY)

In short the draft is shit.
Especially 2.3 - Timeline.

The IETF did not approve a previous version of this shit - my previous rants on 
it are available at http://www.guninski.com/rfcsec.html
In a real world scenario, if ones suffers from fucked up beer, one sues the beer 
maker and goes to the news. This draft makes one wait when a proof that the 
warez are fucked up is found.
The good news in this draft is that warez vendors from oisafety realize they are 
lost and helpless in the vulnerability war and actually have lost it 
technologically.
Who the oisafety.org think they are to tell me what to do with my intellectual 
property? From the members list of oisafety they are just bunch of companies 
whose goal is to maximize profit.

IMHO http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-August/000822.html 
is much better to follow.

Once again, the draft is shit.

-- 
Georgi
"You can't quench the unquenchable." - Ivan Vazov

Craig Ozancin wrote:
> The Organization for Internet Safety is pleased to announce the
> beginning of the public comment period for the Draft Security
> Vulnerability Reporting and Responding Process.  This draft process is
> the result of a lengthy collaboration between leading security
> researchers and  software vendors.  We have worked hard to develop a
> process that addresses the needs of both security researchers and
> software vendors, and provides a framework for achieving our shared
> objective of improving security for computer users, the Internet, and
> the critical infrastructures that depend on it.  We welcome your
> comments on the draft. Please read the draft and find instructions on
> submitting comments at http://www.oisafety.org/.
> 
> The period for comments will close on 7 July, 2003.  The final process
> document will be released at the Black Hat Briefings (www.blackhat.com)
> in Las Vegas from 28-30 July, 2003.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
>