lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030605132938.GD16033@eiv.com>
From: smcmahon at eiv.com (Shawn McMahon)
Subject: AW: Zone Alarm

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:30:15PM -0400, JT said:
> I always thought it was illogical to let packets reach the machine I'm
> trying to protect. I'd rather pass through a dedicated machine. Are there
> any advantages TO using a production machine as a firewall?? 

Well, 80% of attacks are internal, so there's an advantage to having a
software firewall as ONE of your layers, in that it's pretty costly to
have a seperate dedicated firewall for every machine.


-- 
Shawn McMahon     | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill,
EIV Consulting    | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any
UNIX and Linux	  | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure
http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030605/c88623ae/attachment.bin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ