Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2gdghPw3q0GMjLpwXYiQDsKAAAAQAAAAKZXXbB5EY0yR9w6SXE0cOgEAAAAA@intract.org>
From: ml at intract.org (Michael Linke)
Subject: AW: Zone Alarm

My statement was not that HW firewall are useless and that everyone should
switch from HW Firewalls to SW Firewalls. Of course HW Firewalls are a
strong protection for any corporate network. In our Network we also have a
HW Firewall and the Internet Server is protected with a iptables fw. 

So we don't use Zone alarm there.

 

But for home users it is nice protection. No home user would set up a hw
Firewall unless he has for example a DSL Router. 

Home users try out shareware and adware stuff. And using a software firewall
a home user can deny for example adware software to download banner from the
internet or upload any private data to the vendor server. 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

intract - any business anywhere
Michael Linke
Netzwerkadministrator
Heilbronnerstr. 50
D-73728 Esslingen
Germany
Phone  : +49 384 16297 50
Fax      : +49 711 35152 89
mobile  : +49 178 51 52 959
e-mail   :  <mailto:ml@...ract.org> ml@...ract.org

ICQ      : 141033973
webside:    <http://www.intract.org/> http://www.intract.org

 

  _____  

Von: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] Im Auftrag von Ben
Tyson-Norrman
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2003 10:59
An: 'Schmehl, Paul L'; Ben Tyson-Norrman; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com

 

What's worse is not only did I forget to switch to plain text - but out
stupid mail server sticks some marketing junk on the end as well....

Like anyone on this list would go to MIP anyway :-) 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Schmehl, Paul L [ <mailto:pauls@...allas.edu>
mailto:pauls@...allas.edu] 
Sent: 04 June 2003 18:52 
To: Ben Tyson-Norrman; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com 
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm 

 

I'm not sure why you'd expect derision for that question.  I'd be more 
likely to give it to you for using HTML email. :-) 

Zone Alarm is fine for a home user on the Internet.  It's certainly 
better than putting an unprotected Windows box out there.  I'd 
personally prefer a DSL router or a *nix box running a "real" firewall, 
but ZA is fine for most people. 

Who's the "everyone" who say that ZA is crap? 

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu) 
Adjunct Information Security Officer 
The University of Texas at Dallas 
AVIEN Founding Member 
 <http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/> http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Ben Tyson-Norrman [ <mailto:ben@...waytv.co.uk>
mailto:ben@...waytv.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:53 AM 
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com 
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm 

 

I'm not sure I can ask this question without derision, but here goes... 
Zone Alarm, is it really as crap as everyone makes out.... or is the 
usual posturing by ill-informed...? 

Visit our web site @ www.twowaytv.com 
This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named
recipient(s) only and may be confidential, legally privileged and protected
by law. If you are not a named addressee or have received this transmission
in error, please notify us immediately at postmaster@...waytv.co.uk and then
delete this e-mail. As Internet communications are not secure we do not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or
responsibility for any change made to this message after the original sender
sent it.  Save for this legal notice, the contents or opinions contained
within this e-mail are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily
represent those of Two Way TV Ltd unless otherwise specifically stated. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030605/d80f2978/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists