full-disclosure - [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306060140300.3108@yhpvshtr.serrfreir.pb.hx>
From: eddie at lucifuge.freeserve.co.uk (eddie)
Subject: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm

On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Zach Forsyth wrote:

> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:42:21 +1000
> From: Zach Forsyth <Zach.Forsyth@...ndra.com>
> To: eddie <eddie@...ifuge.freeserve.co.uk>
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
>
> Thanks for playing:
>
> > However, Quirk's Exception: Intentional invocation of this so-called
> > "Nazi Clause" is ineffectual. (net.legends faq)
>

> Z

Sir, your attitude can only be compared to that of the reprehensible
and, fortunately, late Herr Hitler. Now, if HE'D paid more attention
to basic network security and less to invading other countries he
might still be in power today. But, of course, he wouldn't listen
to his sysadmins.....

(Am I on topic yet ?)

Eddie
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eddie [mailto:eddie@...ifuge.freeserve.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, 6 June 2003 10:28 AM
> To: Zach Forsyth
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Zach Forsyth wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:20:34 +1000
> > From: Zach Forsyth <Zach.Forsyth@...ndra.com>
> > To: eddie <eddie@...ifuge.freeserve.co.uk>,
> > full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
> >
> > Who are you the netiquette nazi?
> >
>
> No, the grammar nazi. You're missing a comma up there.
> Unless, of course, you mean "Who IS you the netiquette nazi?" in which
> case I haven't a clue. This is fun, can we try speeling flayms next?
>
> Eddie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eddie [mailto:eddie@...ifuge.freeserve.co.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, 6 June 2003 9:20 AM
> > To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Ben Tyson-Norrman wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:11:07 +0100
> > > From: Ben Tyson-Norrman <ben@...waytv.co.uk>
> > > To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
> > >
> > > As I started this one - can I put a stop to it...
> > >
> > > What was it I read the other day, if you call someone a Nazi then
> > > officially that's the end of the thread...
> > >
> > > Okay I'm going to call me, ben@...waytv.co.uk, erstwhile postee in
> > > html, user of Windows 2000 (and BSD and Linux and Solaris, before
> > > you start), sending email via Exchange which attaches a crappy
> > > disclaimer
> > > - a complete and utter Nazi....
> > >
> >
> > Ahhh, you refer to Godwins Law, (Godwin's Rule) Any off-topic mention
> > of Hitler or Nazis will bring the thread it is mentioned in to an
> > irrelevant and off-topic end very soon; every thread on UseNet has a
> > constantly-increasing probability to contain such a mention.
> >
> > However, Quirk's Exception: Intentional invocation of this so-called
> > "Nazi Clause" is ineffectual. (net.legends faq)
> >
> > And so this worthless thread continues...
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> >
>
>