| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200306131854.56930.a.gietl@e-admin.de> From: a.gietl at e-admin.de (Andreas Gietl) Subject: Re: Administrivia: Poll On Friday 13 June 2003 17:47, dev-null@...id.com wrote: sounds good to me. This way we could keep all the questions out and just let "full disclosure" in. But i wonder if this may raise to legal problems for the moderators. Maybe sometimes a vendor comes to the solution the disclosure of a security vuln lead to damage. He may not get the "poster", but he will get the moderators. Since the moderators MUST read all posts, they will be responsible for the information that goes on to the list and have to judge if the content is legal or not. So this would be kinnda hot .... > I find it interesting that nobody has mentioned the obvious solution. Keep > this list unmoderated, and create a second list, full-disclosure-moderated, > that consists of moderated posts to the original list. All we need is a > listserver and people willing to moderate. > > Dave Aitel of ImmunitySec started up just such a list after a similar spate > of OT activity last summer, but it seems to have disappeared. Anybody else > willing to take up the reigns? > > -- > This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at www.no-id.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- e-admin internet gmbh Andreas Gietl tel +49 941 3810884 Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35 fax +49 89 244329104 93051 Regensburg mobil +49 171 6070008 PGP/GPG-Key unter http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists