full-disclosure - Re: Administrivia: Poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200306181001.28452.steve@videogroup.com>
From: steve at videogroup.com (Steve)
Subject: Re: Administrivia: Poll

On Friday 13 June 2003 12:54 pm, Andreas Gietl wrote:
>On Friday 13 June 2003 17:47, dev-null@...id.com wrote:
>
>sounds good to me. This way we could keep all the questions out and
> just let "full disclosure" in.
>
>But i wonder if this may raise to legal problems for the moderators.
> Maybe sometimes a vendor comes to the solution the disclosure of a
> security vuln lead to damage. He may not get the "poster", but he
> will get the moderators. Since the moderators MUST read all posts,
> they will be responsible for the information that goes on to the list
> and have to judge if the content is legal or not. So this would be
> kinnda hot ....

Legal?!?

Since when does the accurecy or availability of listings on FD (or any 
other list) constitute anything more than "For Your Info, but you 
decide for yourself" postings?

-- 
 
Steve Szmidt
V.P. Information Technology
Video Group Distributors, Inc.