lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0306190917540.14308-100000@server.dimick.net>
From: denis at dimick.net (Denis Dimick)
Subject: Linux firewall

Nope was a directed attack from EEye.. They basically bragged that they 
could crack any box.. So I let them try.. They did a portscan, portsentry 
saw it and dropped the route back to them.. The cried foul, I told them 
they need to learn about stealth scans.. They went away.. Wish I still 
have the e-mail logs from it.. Was pretty funny to read..

On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Curt Purdy wrote:

> Have used both Linux and FreeBSD for firewalling, and though Linux is very
> easy with some of the auto setup distros out there, if you are a business
> with assets to protect, I would trust BSD as a much more stable platform for
> firewalling (course some idiots out there are actually using windoze isa for
> firewalling, can we say stable :)
> 
> As far as EEye, I believe you will find those were merely automated scans
> that were coming from their ip's.
> 
> Curt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of Denis Dimick
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:45 PM
> To: Gabe Arnold
> Cc: Spencer, Gary TRI-S INC; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Linux firewall
> 
> 
> 
> Dont know about BSD.. But I would use Linux.. This is what I use everyday
> for the past 5 years.. Have yet to have anyone get thru.. Even the morons
> at EEye have tried..
> 
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Gabe Arnold wrote:
> 
> > I would suggest you use an OpenBSD 3.3 setup with the native PF
> > (Packet Filter)package which is based on the 'BSD IPF package.
> > It's quite nice, easy to use, and very secure.  I'd check out
> > www.openbsd.org and www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ for a good overview of the
> > PF package and how to use it.
> >
> > --Gabe
> >
> >
> > * Spencer, Gary  TRI-S INC (spencerg@....army.mil) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello everyone. I have been following the discussions for a few months
> now
> > > and enjoy the technical information that everyone has to share. What
> would
> > > your recommendations be for a Linux firewall? And would you use a 50,000
> > > Cisco firewall instead??
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gary.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ