| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20030619170435.GA13519@eiv.com> From: smcmahon at eiv.com (Shawn McMahon) Subject: Destroying PCs remotely? On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:32:37AM -0700, Dan Stromberg said: > > He who would give up essential security for temporary liberty shall > > have neither. > > > > essential security -> tipical for post-911; and you really believe > > this, don't you? > > poor folks > > Shawn's words are actually a bit of a jumble from the original quote: > > They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. No, they're a carefully-considered counterpoint to the original quote, because I've found this to be more effective in stiring debate than just attempting to point out the crucial importance of the words "essential" and "temporary" in the original. Some people Just Don't Get It. -- Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030619/1ab2f458/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists