[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Law11-OE47jjfdlWD8N0003c0cb@hotmail.com>
From: se_cur_ity at hotmail.com (morning_wood)
Subject: Indigostar - Perledit
right, i did not know exactly how to classify it, mabey there is a
buffer for the connection
and its not flushing on disconnect?? it does bind to 0.0.0.0:1956
I assume looking at the file it is for traceback function in the
registered version.
Nevertheless a interesting scenario for a DoS, type of thing targeted
at a user
is quite interesting.
morning_wood
----- Original Message -----
From: "petard" <petard@....lonestar.org>
To: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity@...mail.com>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Indigostar - Perledit
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:12:31AM -0700, morning_wood wrote:
> > Vunerability:
> > -------------
> > Remote Overflow
>
> What evidence did you see that this is an overflow? While I wouldn't
discount
> the possibility of an overflow being present somewhere here, the
crash alone
> doesn't necessarily imply an overflow. In fact, I'd say that this
most likely
> isn't unless there is some specific evidence to the contrary.
>
> At any rate, this does certainly open the possibility of an
irritating denial
> of service attack against perledit users. It should almost certainly
only
> listen on 127.0.0.0.1:1956 instead of 0.0.0.0:1956. Does anyone know
why this
> editor accepts remote connections in the first place?
>
> Regards,
> petard
>
> - --
> "There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand
binary,
> and those who don't." --unknown
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
>
> iD8DBQE+9htjgkiZ59A0kiQRAu+XAJ908VfLIqeRYFRwKh9H0+APQJcD/QCbBnD7
> hg2vhT8CQ/wLpC8kntV1WKI=
> =FUYA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists