[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030623152124.GD15098@eiv.com>
From: smcmahon at eiv.com (Shawn McMahon)
Subject: AW: Windows Messenger Popup Spam on UDP Por t 10 26
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:52:06PM +0200, vogt@...senet.com said:
>
> Most spam is NOT sent out via port 25. It arrives via port 25, but it
> almost always relayed inbetween. Some years back, open relays were the
> main problem. However, we've dug into things a bit and found to our
> surprise that not only are they not the main problem anymore, but in
> fact a tiny minority. The main problem is open socks proxies (port 1080).
That is primarily thanks to the efforts of the anti-spam community, and
is a measure of their success.
Anyone involved in law enforcement will tell you that a large part of it
is relocation of crime, not prevention per se. The criminals will
continue to commit crimes by and large, but a police presence (and many
other things, see any article on community-oriented policing or "broken
windows theory") makes them go somewhere else to do it.
> don't want to RECEIVE spam, only to send it). We also know that 90% of
> the current Internet population doesn't know the difference between an
> open proxy and a cup holder.
BTW, that's the real danger of the "open your CDROM tray" exploit; a web
page might close it, spilling your coffee. :-)
--
Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill,
EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any
UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure
http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030623/39f72777/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists