full-disclosure - Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again )

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030701175919.91101.qmail@web40012.mail.yahoo.com>
From: cesarc56 at yahoo.com (Cesar)
Subject: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again )

Code will always have bugs, humans are not perfect,
but risks can be reduced if companies would be more
"responsable" and  if they would spend more time,
resources, money in testing their software before
releasing it.

Cesar.
--- Mike Fratto <mfratto@....com> wrote:
> Not to get into a religious argument over this, but
> if programmers did
> proper data scrubbing and bounds checking regardless
> of the language, there
> wouldn't be much of a problem either. Granted, I am
> not uber programmer (I
> have hacked together proggies of a couple of
> thousand lines for my own use
> and I am sure there were lots of problems in them)
> but even being self
> taught, I learned to do data scrubbing and bounds
> checking just for
> reliability. I have to think it is taught in
> programming 101.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com