[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002a01c345d1$5dfc8ee0$680aa8c0@ph34r>
From: steve at entrenchtech.com (Steve W. Manzuik)
Subject: RE: Symantec Change Posting Criteria
Al,
This wasn't an attempt to stir anything and I would have gladly posted this
to *your* list be you have seen it fit to block pretty much everything I
post to your lists. Something that in my opinion is uncalled for and quite
immature but that issue is older than the archive I "dragged" out of
www.archives.org and it was my opinion that it was long in the past.
Obviously, I was wrong.
My post was a simple attempt to clarify things. You guys have a ton of
people (right or wrong, most wrong) trying to point fingers at you on
various fronts -- so whats wrong with clearing the air and having "full
disclosure"? You will notice that I did not accuse you of anything but
rather pointed out the obvious hoping that you would clarify.
As for the 1998 date. The archive I pulled, if you notice the link, was
from 2001 which in 2001 they had the following offices note the first office
on the list;
http://web.archive.org/web/20011111201453/www.corest.com/company/offices.htm
l
USA
Paragon Towers
233 Needham Street | Suite 300
Newton, MA 02464-1502
Tel: (617) 454-1190
Fax: (617) 454-1025
info.usa@...est.com
Argentina
Florida 141 | 2? cuerpo | 7? piso
(C1005AAC) Buenos Aires
Tel/Fax: (54 11) 4878-CORE (2673)
info.argentina@...est.com
Brazil
Rua do R?cio 288 | 7? andar | Conj. 73 e 74
Vila Ol?mpia
S?o Paulo/SP
CEP 04552-000
Tel: (55 11) 3054-2534 / 35
info.brasil@...est.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alfred Huger [mailto:ah@...urityfocus.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:49 PM
> To: Steve W. Manzuik
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec Change Posting Criteria
>
>
>
>
>
> Not that it's worth encouraging this thread but my post to
> pen-test is direct and true. My previous finances are not
> anyones business. Further when I did invest in CORE it was
> well before they had an american presence (1998 to be exact)
> The share at the time which is long since a non-issue was
> less than .001% of the company which at the time consisted of
> mayby 10 people. You'll notice you dragged that out of an
> archive not their current site. It's a much differant company
> now and one without my money in it. This thread has
> progressed far past this on the pen-test list but it's in
> keeping with your character that you'd take one instance and
> post here to help stir the pot a little more. I'd say I was
> shocked but..
>
> -al
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists