[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE46D0386422BF4FA18E1A9FB67161A004D0806B@GOAEVS01.abf.ad.airborne.com>
From: Brad.Bemis at airborne.com (Brad Bemis)
Subject: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid (
Reuters)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> If they got stuff from two independent vendors, that would
> at least give you a snowball's chance of half your systems
> surviving any given attack.
> And if there's *any* agency in the federal government that needs to be
> bulletproof, DHS is it....
I have my own personal opinions regarding multi-vendor solutions in a
complex enterprise environment that I'd prefer not to argue on this
particular list (let's just say that I believe in using the right tool
for
the job), but in my experience there is no combination of vendor
products
that can provide a 'bulletproof' security solution. Your point, however
is
well taken.
Thank you for your time and attention,
========================
Brad Bemis
========================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPxWPH5DnOfS48mrdEQJVNQCg9wLCAiXV3ddJ8GBHUd8Q8rkLXwkAniT1
mZjWGDLWp0EsF21a+4tJFUgL
=zwra
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists