full-disclosure - Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reut ers)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AE46D0386422BF4FA18E1A9FB67161A004D08073@GOAEVS01.abf.ad.airborne.com>
From: Brad.Bemis at airborne.com (Brad Bemis)
Subject: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid (
 Reut ers)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Now that is a very reasonable argument that I am inclined to agree with,
and it opens up an entirely new avenue of debate on the matter  ;-)


Thank you for your time and attention,

========================
Brad Bemis
========================


> From: Dehner, Benjamin T. [mailto:Ben.Dehner@...mont.com]
> 
> I can see this as just the opposite.  Microsoft can use the "homeland
> security" classification as an argument against 
> full-disclosure free speach,
> thus prohibiting discussion, criticism, and publication of 
> security flaws of
> Microsoft products.  This is, after all, the company who's licensing
> agreement forbids using off-the-shelf software for 
> benchmarking purposes,
> and who's non-disclosure-agreements with public institutions are
> unreviewable because the terms of those agreements are covered by
> non-disclosure.
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBPxWeApDnOfS48mrdEQIStwCfYiViI6JZpjB9UElyZurYcsj+EnUAnjDf
oGJ8vi3JkpHbxfqs5arZAkwE
=KZHy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----