full-disclosure - Participation in System Administrator Survey

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1058386924.11349.20.camel@doom.home.ludost.net>
From: vasil at ludost.net (Васил Колев)
Subject: Participation in System Administrator Survey

1) there is nothing in the list charter, AFAIK, that prohibits such
postings.
2) It's a good survey, that doesn't collect email adresses or such
things, it's one of the best I've seen in the last year (it can use some
modification, thouhg :) )
3) It's not spam, if sent from someone subscribed to the list, and with
ad idea that's like the idea of the list (and not total commercial
advertisment)

Feel free to correct me, if I'm wrong.

?? ?, 2003-07-16 ? 21:53, Schmehl, Paul L ??????:
> This might be appropriate for this list, I don't know.  I'll leave that up to the owners.  But the fact that you spammed me and everyone else on another private list that I'm on prompted me to ignore your request completely.  I suggest that, in the future, you find a different way to ask for input for surveys.
> 
> And yes, I'm in academe too, so I fully understand the need to do surveys.  But spamming people is *not* the right way to go about it.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030716/61fec9a6/attachment.bin