[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200307170955.44682.carl@learningshophull.co.uk>
From: carl at learningshophull.co.uk (Carl Livitt)
Subject: cisco
> workaround would be to firewall the router's own IP address(es). This
> would still allow the router to perform its routing function for other
> IPs
>
> Y'mean this *still* isn't done as standard best practice?
>
> *sigh* ... well, perhaps not, because of speed considerations, real
> or perceived, from slapping an ACL on an interface. Can't accept a minor
> slowdown in the interest of security, now can we?
Or, in the case of business users with a Cisco ADSL router that is remotely
managed, it's not possible for a customer to firewall the interface - it's
plugged directly into the ADSL line.
In our case, our provider simply asked 'What Cisco advisory?' when I called
them about it this morning. I had to forward the advisory to them myself and
am still waiting....
Sheeesh.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists