full-disclosure - Re: Cisco IOS Denial of Service that affects most Cisco IOS routers- requires power cycle to recover

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00ae01c35089$d740ddc0$272ea8c0@LUFKIN.DPSOL.COM>
From: purdy at tecman.com (Curt Purdy)
Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Denial of Service  that affects most Cisco IOS routers- requires power cycle to recover

If the packet expires in transit i.e. ttl 1 to router 2 hops away means it
never gets to that router.  Not possible to fill a queue with a packet that
is dropped by the previous router. Check out "Internet Core Protocols" at
Oreilly.

Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, MCSE+I, CNE, CCDA
Information Security Engineer
DP Solutions
cpurdy@...ol.com
936.637.7977 ext. 121

----------------------------------------

If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of
lee.e.rian@...sus.gov
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:55 PM
To: rnews@...er.com
Cc: incidents@...urityfocus.com; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco IOS Denial of Service that affects
most Cisco IOS routers- requires power cycle to recover

> The kickup to supervisor level happens when the packet is targeted
> directly at the router's IP address (per first Cisco advisory) or just
> has its TTL expire in transit past the router (per revised Cisco
> advisory).

Has anyone been able to verify that the problem occurs when the TTL expires
"in transit"?

I've been able to get packets stuck on the input queue by sending to the
router's interface address, sending to <network, 0> and <network, -1> but
sending to a router two hops away with a TTL of 1 just gives me an icmp ttl
exceeded & nothing new stuck on the input queue.

Lee

                      Richard Johnson
                      <rdump@...er.com>        To:
incidents@...urityfocus.com
                                               cc:
                      07/20/2003 03:20         Subject:  Re: Cisco IOS
Denial of Service  that affects most Cisco IOS routers-
                      AM                        requires power cycle to
recover
                      Please respond to
                      rnews

In article
<Pine.BSO.4.53.0307172223150.11409@...annon.precision-guesswork.com>,
 Tina Bird <tbird@...cision-guesswork.com> wrote:

> information on the detailed structure of the evil packets in these
> protocols is not yet public AFAIK.

The router has problems if it receives a packet, content irrelevant,
that makes it to supervisor level claiming an IP protocol that it
doesn't have code to handle.

The kickup to supervisor level happens when the packet is targeted
directly at the router's IP address (per first Cisco advisory) or just
has its TTL expire in transit past the router (per revised Cisco
advisory).

Send enough packets (default 75), and the input queue is full.  hping is
enough of a launch platform for that--there's no need for
questionable-source exploit binaries when testing.

Richard

--
My mailbox. My property. My personal space. My rules. Deal with it.
                        http://www.river.com/users/share/cluetrain/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html