full-disclosure - DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) 

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:29:56 CDT, Ron DuFresne said:
> I'm just trying to understand how corporate networks would/should be at
> risk with this, why port 135 would not be filtered already limiting
> exposure.  Is there a reason why it would not be that I'm missing?  The

It's the rare corporate net indeed that doesn't have a single remotely
exploitable copy of IE or Outlook left in its entire address space.

And Slammer proved quite well that having a firewall doesn't stop squat.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030727/dc0bfae7/attachment.bin