[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030728001544.58614.qmail@web80606.mail.yahoo.com>
From: seclistaddress at yahoo.com (manohar singh)
Subject: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)
Well,
So far about a 100 emails on this subject (dcom.c),
and all this is doing is irritate everybody.
Guys, this IS an unmoderated list, and people WILL
post exploits. Clear and simple. Let's just grow up,
and get back to work instead of cribbing in public
forums.
ms
--- Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:29:56 CDT, Ron DuFresne said:
> > I'm just trying to understand how corporate
> networks would/should be at
> > risk with this, why port 135 would not be filtered
> already limiting
> > exposure. Is there a reason why it would not be
> that I'm missing? The
>
> It's the rare corporate net indeed that doesn't have
> a single remotely
> exploitable copy of IE or Outlook left in its entire
> address space.
>
> And Slammer proved quite well that having a firewall
> doesn't stop squat.
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists