lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030728001544.58614.qmail@web80606.mail.yahoo.com>
From: seclistaddress at yahoo.com (manohar singh)
Subject: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) 

Well,

So far about a 100 emails on this subject (dcom.c),
and  all this is doing is irritate everybody.

Guys, this IS an unmoderated list, and people WILL
post exploits. Clear and simple. Let's just grow up,
and get back to work instead of cribbing in public
forums.

ms




--- Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:29:56 CDT, Ron DuFresne said:
> > I'm just trying to understand how corporate
> networks would/should be at
> > risk with this, why port 135 would not be filtered
> already limiting
> > exposure.  Is there a reason why it would not be
> that I'm missing?  The
> 
> It's the rare corporate net indeed that doesn't have
> a single remotely
> exploitable copy of IE or Outlook left in its entire
> address space.
> 
> And Slammer proved quite well that having a firewall
> doesn't stop squat.
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature 



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ