| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20030728180620.0ffd1047.list@hardlined.com> From: list at hardlined.com (Shanphen Dawa) Subject: dcom exploit code observations I would also like to know, since I though the remote computer would experience some sort of DoS instead of exploitation if the wrong return address was used. On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:20:20 +0200 Knud Erik H?jgaard <kain@...op.dk> wrote: > morning_wood wrote: > [snip] > > THIS IS NOT THE CASE... > > this .bat works perfect... > > So somehow running the exploit from a .bat file with some shameless > selfpromotion makes svchost _not_ crash upon hitting a wrong return address? > > Would you care to elaborate on how you pull that off? > > -- > kokanin > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > -- /* "To avoid all evil, to cultivate good, and to cleanse one's mind this is the teaching of the Buddhas." Martin Ekendahl http://www.hardlined.com martin@...dlined.com */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists