full-disclosure - DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871080DEC5874D41B4E3AFC5C400611E06B47626@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: DCOM RPC exploit  (dcom.c)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Banniza [mailto:robert@...tprompt.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:26 AM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)
> 
> 
> Just received this from ISS minutes ago...Another RPC 
> vulnerability scanning tool:
> 
>http://www.iss.net/support/product_utilities/ms03-026rpc.php
>
>Couple things we have noticed....
>
>1) OS identification is pretty much hit and miss
>2) We have seen where XP SP1 unpatched doesn't show vulnerable 
>(this patch was previously installed and then un-installed.) 
>However, machine is confirmed vulnerable.

I did a simple comparison of the two tools on one VLAN.  They both found
the same hosts and they both agreed on which were patched and which were
not patched.

>Anyone else know what the last column of the output means? 
>i.e. '5.6' or '0.0'?

I didn't see anything on their site explaining what those numbers mean
and both patched and vulnerable machines produced both numbers, so I
have no idea what they mean.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/