full-disclosure - OT but related.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F033F2DC8@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
From: John.Airey at rnib.org.uk (John.Airey@...b.org.uk)
Subject: OT but related.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Parker, Jeff (MSE) [mailto:jeff.t.parker@...com]
> Sent: 31 July 2003 03:28
> To: John.Airey@...b.org.uk; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] OT but related.
> 
> 
> Yes, I've signed on to this list only 2 days ago and have noticed the
> very same cross-posting.
> 
> Case in point:
> My group uses Update Expert - I noticed, determined and 
> documented how &
> why it fails to successfully roll up Win2K SP4 and MS03-026.
> I sent this information to Russ (NTBugtraq's editor & 
> moderator) and he
> posted it.
> Crazy enough, this info shows up a few hours later from Paul Schmehl's
> as his posting "Patching Networks redux."
> Wording is pretty much identical.
> 
> Let me be the first to cite Russ's actual (original) posting:
> 
This wasn't what I meant by cross-posting. I read Paul's post and that one
and can't see two identical sentences. Can you show me one? These look to me
to be two individuals who've discovered the same problem by different means.

What I meant was getting multiple copies of the same mail. It turns out that
Bugtraq is resending the message to full-disclosure if it is in the cc field
(which is unbelievably dumb). 

That is to say, any message that is cc'ed to Bugtraq and Full Disclosure
goes to Full Disclosure twice. I'm cc'ing this to Mark Cox as they might be
able to fix it (like using just the "to" field).

- 
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@...b.org.uk 

The trouble with post-modernism isn't just that no-one actually believes in
it, but no-one can believe in it.

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk