[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030802193231.1d8ff649.tcpdumb@pentiumbuster.homelinux.com>
From: tcpdumb at pentiumbuster.homelinux.com (tcpdumb)
Subject: possible MS03-026 worm?
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 11:58:00 -0500
"mobly99" <dhopper@...ritech.net> wrote:
> Seems to be a possible worm based on the RPC/DCOM exploit making the
> rounds?
Definetly. Depending on the logfiles from our Firewall at work, there must be something out there. Infected machines found at:
156.34.222.0/24
194.96.90.0/24
196.30.232.0/24
200.0.0.0/8
202.0.0.0/8
and so on. Their traffic is about 50-75% of a day's traffic. Fortunately without any damage to our systems. The worm seems to check hosts with a funny ryhtm within a Subnet:
IP=123.123.123.1
$IP+5
$IP+1
$IP+4
$IP+2
$IP+3
$IP+3
$IP+2
$IP+4
$IP+1
$IP+5
...
...
Dunno why but I found it out reading the 24h output of our Firewall. The coder must be stupid/[totally stoned] or simply made a mistake coding the loops for scanning.
Strange thing,
Lukas
> puts these files in %systemdrive%
> rpc.exe
> rpctest.exe
> tftpd.exe
> worm.exe
> lolx.exe
>
> also in %windir%\system32
> lolx.exe
> dcomx.exe
>
> rpc.exe and dcomx.exe appear in the running tasks.
>
>
> I pulled samples of them and submitted to SARC.
>
>
> -Dave
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists