lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: psz at maths.usyd.edu.au (Paul Szabo) Subject: Re: [SEC-LABS] Win32 Device Drivers Communication ... > The Sec-Labs security research group found a bug in Win32 Device Drivers > Communication, the white-paper for this vulnerability can be viewed at > http://sec-labs.hack.pl , the exploit code for Symantec Norton AntiVirus > '2002 (probably all versions) Device Driver is also stored at our homepage. > > The full link to the white paper: > http://sec-labs.hack.pl/papers/win32ddc.php Two questions: Can this problem be classified as a "shatter" attack? The similarity I see is that Windows takes an address and does things with it without any checks. Could other drivers (part of a "standard" Windows install) be exploited? Maybe the CON: driver where we have some control over the output? I apologize if these are "stupid" questions. Thanks, Paul Szabo - psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney 2006 Australia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists