full-disclosure - Reacting to a server compromise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3F2D9577.1070705@jacox.net>
From: computer at jacox.net (James A. Cox)
Subject: Reacting to a server compromise

I've never heard of a rule that prohibits the introduction in evidence 
of Norton Ghost images or any other electronic evidence.  In most places 
in the US, I think, there wouldn't be any hard and fast rules; it would 
be up to the judge to decide whether the evidence was reliable enough.