lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: Brad.Bemis at airborne.com (Brad Bemis) Subject: Reacting to a server compromise -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In general, digital evidence and the methods used to collect it must stand up to tests of 'reasonableness" as determined by the presiding judge. Thank you for your time and attention, ======================== Brad Bemis ======================== Email Notice: This communication may contain sensitive information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error; do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained herein for any purpose. Please alert the sender that you have received this message in error, and delete the copy that you received. > -----Original Message----- > From: James A. Cox [mailto:computer@...ox.net] > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 4:07 PM > To: Jennifer Bradley > Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Reacting to a server compromise > > > I've never heard of a rule that prohibits the introduction in > evidence > of Norton Ghost images or any other electronic evidence. In > most places > in the US, I think, there wouldn't be any hard and fast > rules; it would > be up to the judge to decide whether the evidence was reliable enough. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPy6JNJDnOfS48mrdEQLK3gCePqhRhiorx9XIiVVAY5EeczhReBwAn2Ll fGBCIWmS9abtcFPsYglvDJ0A =RO5b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists