full-disclosure - [inbox] Re: Reacting to a server compromise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200308060228.h762Sq5m003117@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: [inbox] Re: Reacting to a server compromise 

On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:45:59 +0200, Michal Zalewski said:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Curt Purdy wrote:
> 
> > Actually the traditionally accepted court evidence is real-time printouts o
f
> > data received by the syslog server.
> 
> So what would stop anyone from replacing some of the printouts after the
> fact?

It's kind of hard to replace sheet 1,487 from a box of fanfold paper. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030805/cb5b73d9/attachment.bin