[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030807010924.GA17377@aboleo.net>
From: nik at aboleo.net (Nik Reiman)
Subject: f-prot not catching mimail ?
As previously noted, the problem here seems to be with the f-prot
binary, not the actual virus signatures/definitions. Try upgrading
the f-prot package, and it'll probably work fine.
-Nik
psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au quoth:
> >>I cannot see anything "special" in the MIME structure of Mimail that would
> >>cause f-prot to miss the ZIP attachment (or maybe it is the structure of
> >>the ZIP that f-prot cannot unpack?).
> >
> > I was told its the encoding scheme in the .html file thats the problem.
> > Currently the scanner does not support that type of encoding.
>
> It seems to me that the HTML contains the binary EXE without any encoding:
>
> $ cat -v message.html | fold | head -5
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Location:File://foo.exe
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
>
> MZM-^P^@^C^@^@^@^D^@^@^@...?M-^?^@^@...^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@
>
> Regardless, f-prot should list the ZIP attachment, and the files contained
> within the ZIP ...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul Szabo - psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/
> School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney 2006 Australia
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
--
Nik Reiman // nik@...leo.net \\ http://www.aboleo.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists