full-disclosure - Vulnerability Disclosure Debate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3F32AA29.1030303@guninski.com>
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: Vulnerability Disclosure Debate

Florian Weimer wrote:
> The free software camp has adopted the responsible disclosure process
> while Microsoft still was struggling with significant security issues

Unless you can prove this, I consider this pure FUD.
 From personal experience with losers like m$ and on the other hand open source 
camp, your statement is completely wrong.
Personally don't see any open source in the OIS crap.

> 
> ..., but the days of full
> disclosure are over.

lol.
This is pure FUD.
Full disclosure is alive and well, no matter what you think.
Virus writing is illegal, but are virii dead?
If full disclosure becomes "obfuscated", people like you will have troubles 
reconstructing exploits from sniffer logs - just check the only exploit which m$ 
fixed soon.

georgi