full-disclosure - aside: worm vs. worm?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <005601c36092$aee1ef40$7b5c1e41@valw2kpro01>
From: arian.evans at bigfoot.com (Arian J. Evans)
Subject: aside:  worm vs. worm?

Andrew,

# Would anyone consider releasing a patching
# worm on their own network if they knew it wouldn't spread to 
# the rest of the internet or is there a downside to this notion which I'm 
# not realizing?

A worm is a worm is a worm is a worm.

I am most certainly not a big fan of software I can't control,
executing in an arbitrary manner on hosts I hope to control...

I understand what you mean, and where you are going, but
if that is what you want, then I think Microsoft SMS, Shavlik,
Pedestal, and others have highly effective solutions w/out
releasing code that can potentially run in an arbitrary manner...

My $0.01 USD, deprecated for current market value,

Arian J. Evans