full-disclosure - Vulnerability Disclosure Debate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3F3AA729.4090603@algroup.co.uk>
From: ben at algroup.co.uk (Ben Laurie)
Subject: Vulnerability Disclosure Debate

Joel R. Helgeson wrote:
> Managing security by applying patches is fundamentally flawed.  The
> programmers need to write secure code.  The onus is on them, not us.

If you don't like my software, don't run it. Don't presume to tell me
what I should write for you.

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff