lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BAY7-DAV46PGfGqK77V0002b382@hotmail.com> From: rlanguy at hotmail.com (Lan Guy) Subject: ISP's save the Inet from Blaster? I spent 2 hours last night on the phone with My ISP and they gave us work around! Lan Guy ----- Original Message ----- From: Kyp Durron To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:55 AM Subject: [Full-Disclosure] ISP's save the Inet from Blaster? Hello all, Here is something to contemplate. Right now portions or possibly all of Cox, Charter, Comcast and SBC DSL networks are not allowing in or outbound port 135, 139 and 445 traffic. Take into consideration the vast number of uneducated users running XP or 2000 with no protection on those networks. So, is it possible that these ISP's are finally clueing into the dangers that their networks pose to the Internet at large and are partial to thank for Blaster not being a Slammer times 1000? On a funny side note a few of these ISP's are denying the fact that they are blocking those ports, but there is NO way you can scan over 200 client machines and see tons of 5000 (uPnP) ports open and not one 135, 139 or 445. _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030814/ab886187/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists