[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BAY7-DAV46PGfGqK77V0002b382@hotmail.com>
From: rlanguy at hotmail.com (Lan Guy)
Subject: ISP's save the Inet from Blaster?
I spent 2 hours last night on the phone with My ISP and they gave us work
around!
Lan Guy
----- Original Message -----
From: Kyp Durron
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:55 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] ISP's save the Inet from Blaster?
Hello all,
Here is something to contemplate. Right now portions or possibly all of
Cox, Charter, Comcast and SBC DSL networks are not allowing in or outbound
port 135, 139 and 445 traffic. Take into consideration the vast number of
uneducated users running XP or 2000 with no protection on those networks.
So, is it possible that these ISP's are finally clueing into the dangers
that their networks pose to the Internet at large and are partial to thank
for Blaster not being a Slammer times 1000?
On a funny side note a few of these ISP's are denying the fact that they
are
blocking those ports, but there is NO way you can scan over 200 client
machines and see tons of 5000 (uPnP) ports open and not one 135, 139 or
445.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030814/ab886187/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists