full-disclosure - New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F5F54E2EC6FEC14AAC3C9F28E8EE7EB803354E42@nj9620exch002u.mh.lucent.com>
From: mstahlkrantz at lucent.com (Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats))
Subject: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038?

Never mind.  Different issue causing this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats) [mailto:mstahlkrantz@...ent.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:48 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038?

We're starting to see exploit attempts that are followed by probes from the infected host on tcp/4444, and then UDP/1038.  Has anyone else seen this?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030814/90740fc8/attachment.html