full-disclosure - "MS Blast" Win2000 Patch Download

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871080DEC5874D41B4E3AFC5C400611E03F60791@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: "MS Blast" Win2000 Patch Download

Brad, you're on the wrong list if you're looking for *solutions* to
problems.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Bemis [mailto:Brad.Bemis@...borne.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: Ed Carp; Anjan Dave; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] "MS Blast" Win2000 Patch Download
>
> Personally I am getting tired of people making these kinds of 
> comments.  It is obvious that these people have never had 
> responsibility for a large-scale, multi-national enterprise 
> environment that touches so many different organizations 
> world-wide that it is nearly impossible to account for every 
> single Internet access point (not to mention remote access 
> and mobile computers).  While it may be true that blocking 
> port 135 at the firewall would work in an ideal environment, 
> very few of us that deal with security matters in the real 
> world have anything that even begins to approach an ideal 
> environment.  We need to be discussing real solutions to real 
> problems, not verbalizing a continued ignorance of reality.  Sorry for
> the rant, but this topic is getting old quickly!