full-disclosure - MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: kluge at fujitsu.com.au (Steffen Kluge)
Subject: MS should point windowsupdate.com to
	127.0.0.1

On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 09:50, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> And no, this is not just yet again a microsoft thing
> apparently even the FSF can't secure their FTP server.
> Which took 3 months to be detected (jolly :) one has
> to wonder how much trouble that is going to cost,
> though fortunatly most unix admins are more proactive
> in the security front and tend to update.

The difference, though, is that they got rooted in the week between
disclosure of the ptrace bug and publication of a patch. For that, you
can't call them lazy. The interesting question here is, how could the
attacker get an account on the box the first place? Disgruntled insider?
Poor account/password management? Non-root remote exploit? I think that
even after patching the Linux kernels on their servers, the FSF admins
still have some catching up to do.

Cheers
Steffen.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030815/6eb7f71a/attachment.bin