lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <F5F54E2EC6FEC14AAC3C9F28E8EE7EB803354E6B@nj9620exch002u.mh.lucent.com> From: mstahlkrantz at lucent.com (Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats)) Subject: [UPDATE] ping floods Possibly this: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_100559.htm -----Original Message----- From: B3r3n@...osnet.com [mailto:B3r3n@...osnet.com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:26 AM To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Subject: [Full-Disclosure] [UPDATE] ping floods All, What we have here at the moment is the following: 1) IntraNet machines are pinging to random IP addresses (both targetting our IntraNet and outside) 2) From time to time, when a particular machine is pinging from a subnet, it appears some new machines on that subnet are starting to ping too. 3) these pings, grouped together, creates flooding (even if singlely they seems to be ping with a 1/3s TTL delay) impacting the whole IntraNet. 4) Checking a machine part of this ping "flood", we found nothing suspicious (no unknown program, ...) but we dont master Windows technology. The box was antivirused with a well-known vendor solution, up-to-date in its virus definitions. Our assumptions is this might be a brand new worm, not yet known to antivirus companies (no news/alerts on their sites). To solve, we applied on our routers routing the ICMP requests an access-list to bar these requests. This globally solved the problem until we can be able to solve each machine. Thanks Brgrds _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists