full-disclosure - [fd] RE: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18d001c36830$b82d47c0$186310ac@beast24>
From: mike at blakogre.com (Mike V)
Subject: [fd] RE: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!

Popfile would do a fine job.

http://popfile.sourceforge.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joshua Vince" <joshv@...sys.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:49 PM
Subject: [fd] RE: [Full-Disclosure] Subject prefix changing! READ THIS!
SURVEY!!


> #2 or #3.  How are we supposed to filter emails in our inbox w/o it??
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 8tImER [mailto:8tImER@....net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 4:02 PM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Subject prefix changing! READ THIS!
> SURVEY!!
>
>
> My vote goes to choice #1. :]
>
> -- 
> Greetz,
>  8tImER                            mailto:8tImER@....net
>                                    GPG Key-ID: 0xADD46137
>
> Originaltext:
> Am 21.08.2003 um 19:43:02 hast du geschrieben:
>
> > Hey folks,
>
> > ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE AS TO HOW
>
> > THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO CONTINUE OPERATING.
>
> > The subject header is going to change.
>
> > This is a survey to see whether people want:
>
> > 1. To have no subject prefix, that is, we remove [Full-Disclosure] or
> > 2. To shorten the subject prefix from [Full-Disclosure] to [FD]
> > or
> > 3. Do nothing
>
> > 1. The first choice is preferable for me and, I would hope, for most
> > folks. Len says he didn't really want it when he started the list
> > anyways.  So we are actually going to change it now.
>
> > 2. Choice two may be preferable for people who can only filter their
> > incoming messages based on the subject prefix.  So, if you WANT there
> > to continue to be a subject prefix, SPEAK UP!!!
>
> > 3. Choice three sucks and if anyone wants this SPEAK UP so we know
> > just how many people want this.  This is the least preferrable as it
> > clutters the Subject header and makes the list harder to read through
> > for those of us using a text based e-mail client.
>
> > For those of you using procmail or a compatible filter, a good match
> > for Full-Disclosure that relies on headers you will always see in list
>
> > messages goes like this:
>
> > :0:
> > * ^Sender.*full-disclosure-admin@...ts\.netsys\.com
> > full-disclosure
>
> > That matches this header:
>
> > Sender: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
>
> > Alternately, you can tell your Pegasus/Mozilla/Outlook/OE/Whatever
> > to match on this header.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html