full-disclosure - Administrivia: Testing Emergency Virus Filter..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3F455C20.11502.7B77BA14@localhost>
From: nick at virus-l.demon.co.uk (Nick FitzGerald)
Subject: Administrivia: Testing Emergency Virus Filter..

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu to me:

> > trouble with it.  If your "solution" to this problem is to sugegst that 
> > some new file transfer mechanism should be devised and implementations 
> > widely distributed, then you will simply move the target of choice for 
> > the bad guys from SMTP to "Paul And Richard's Excellent And Easy To Use 
> > New File Transfer Protocol"
> 
> Why invent a *new* mechanism when one exists?
> 
> RFC1440 SIFT/UFT: Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer. R. Troth.
>      July 1993. (Format: TXT=17366 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)
> 
> (This was motivated and patterned somewhat like the BITNET 'sendfile'
> facility, and it shows)

Well, I did suggest that it should be widely and commonly deployed (or, 
by implication for a new protocol, seem likely to have a chance to be) 
_and_ easy for ordinary users to use.

SIFT/UFT would appear to neatly avoid -- almost by design -- both of 
those pre-requisites...

Regards,

Nick FitzGerald