[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1061492586.976.17.camel@Grissom.noldata.com>
From: tac at noldata.com (Noldata TAC)
Subject: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!
Let it be as it is now
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 12:43, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE AS TO HOW
> THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO CONTINUE OPERATING.
>
> The subject header is going to change.
>
> This is a survey to see whether people want:
>
> 1. To have no subject prefix, that is, we remove [Full-Disclosure]
> or
> 2. To shorten the subject prefix from [Full-Disclosure] to [FD]
> or
> 3. Do nothing
>
> 1. The first choice is preferable for me and, I would hope, for most folks.
> Len says he didn't really want it when he started the list anyways. So we are
> actually going to change it now.
>
> 2. Choice two may be preferable for people who can only filter their incoming
> messages based on the subject prefix. So, if you WANT there to continue
> to be a subject prefix, SPEAK UP!!!
>
> 3. Choice three sucks and if anyone wants this SPEAK UP so we know just
> how many people want this. This is the least preferrable as it clutters
> the Subject header and makes the list harder to read through for those of us
> using a text based e-mail client.
>
> For those of you using procmail or a compatible filter, a good match
> for Full-Disclosure that relies on headers you will always see in
> list messages goes like this:
>
> :0:
> * ^Sender.*full-disclosure-admin@...ts\.netsys\.com
> full-disclosure
>
> That matches this header:
>
> Sender: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
>
> Alternately, you can tell your Pegasus/Mozilla/Outlook/OE/Whatever
> to match on this header.
--
Noldata TAC <tac@...data.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists