| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20030822101331.136EE6B18C@mail.freebox.mine.nu> From: dan at lockedbox.net (Daniel B) Subject: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! I vote for 1, EVERYONE has mail software that can filter on other headers(stop being lazy people just setup a rule). >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Cappuccio [mailto:chris@...dia.net] >> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:43 AM >> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com >> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! >> >> Hey folks, >> >> ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE AS TO HOW >> THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO CONTINUE OPERATING. >> >> The subject header is going to change. >> >> This is a survey to see whether people want: >> >> 1. To have no subject prefix, that is, we remove [Full-Disclosure] >> or >> 2. To shorten the subject prefix from [Full-Disclosure] to [FD] >> or >> 3. Do nothing >> >> 1. The first choice is preferable for me and, I would hope, for most >> folks. >> Len says he didn't really want it when he started the list anyways. So >> we are >> actually going to change it now. >> >> 2. Choice two may be preferable for people who can only filter their >> incoming >> messages based on the subject prefix. So, if you WANT there to continue >> to be a subject prefix, SPEAK UP!!! >> >> 3. Choice three sucks and if anyone wants this SPEAK UP so we know just >> how many people want this. This is the least preferrable as it clutters >> the Subject header and makes the list harder to read through for those >> of us >> using a text based e-mail client. >> >> For those of you using procmail or a compatible filter, a good match >> for Full-Disclosure that relies on headers you will always see in >> list messages goes like this: >> >> :0: >> * ^Sender.*full-disclosure-admin@...ts\.netsys\.com >> full-disclosure >> >> That matches this header: >> >> Sender: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com >> >> Alternately, you can tell your Pegasus/Mozilla/Outlook/OE/Whatever >> to match on this header. >> >> -- >> Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit -- Seneca >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >> > >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists