full-disclosure - Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: mathieu at gougle.net (Mathieu)
Subject: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!

On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:15:07AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Daniele Muscetta (daniele@...cetta.com) [22/08/03 10:59]:
> > >> ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE
> > >> AS TO HOW THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO
> > >> CONTINUE OPERATING.
> > 
> > > [FD] would be fine.
> > 
> > If it has to be short for those who use text based MUA, at least leave
> > this short one. It should not be such a deal to pass from extra 18 chars
> > in the subject to just 5, should it?
> 
> I used a text-based MUA.  And I find that I get a few words of the subject,
> after I see '[Full-Disclosure]'.
> 
> Personally, I /like/ subject tags, but short ones.  So something like [fd]
> or [fud] would be fine with me.  But I think that the bulk of this decision
     ^^^^^ i don't think it's a _really_ good idea to tag the subject like
that :)

> [...]


imho, i think [FD] Tag is really nice... i do procmail filtering on the
List-Id criteria ...  

- 
--
Mathieu <mathieu@...gle.net>

BOFH excuse #137:

User was distributing pornography on server; system seized by FBI.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030822/be590b6b/attachment.bin