[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000801c36aa1$ac952400$6103c80a@villanm>
From: villain at protonic.com (ViLLaN)
Subject: SpamAssasin - path disclosure
No one is denying that Spamassasin is in use, they are saying that the
section of the header showing the path (what your original post was
about from what I understood), is Interscan, not Spamassasin..
-----Original Message-----
From: morning_wood [mailto:se_cur_ity@...mail.com]
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:25 AM
To: ViLLaN; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure
sigh
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-V
ersion%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google+Search>
&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-Version%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google
+Search
1. http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computer.help/policy/spam_filtering.html
2. http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2003-Apr/0554.html
3. http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_PerMsgStatus.html
4. http://lpsc.in2p3.fr/informatique/faq/spamassassin.html
5. http://www.unit.liu.se/irt/epost/spamassassin.html
still wrong?
Donnie Werner
co-cofounder - Chief Technical Officer
e2-labs Pvt Ltd
----- Original Message -----
From: ViLLaN <mailto:villain@...tonic.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure
Kane is correct... Interscan viruswall is responsible for that
quarantine..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030825/f4230dce/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists