full-disclosure - SpamAssasin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F1D82290F689D411923A00A0C9ACA76F01DDE42B@pyis400.it.alstom.com.au>
From: kane.lightowler at it.alstom.com.au (Kane Lightowler)
Subject: SpamAssasin - path disclosure

ViLLaN - Yes you are correct.
 
Morning_Wood - I never denied that the tag in the header was not spam
assasin.
The tag about the quarantine however is from Trends Interscan Viruswall.
 
What else are you trying to say?
That spam assasin is not only a spam filter but a virus scanner also?
 
If this is your box you are playing with is it running interscan virus wall
or is viruswall sitting as a mail relay anywhere on the network?
 
Even IF spam assasin was to magically start scanning for viruses why the
hell would it quarantine files to a /etc/iscan/virus/ dir?
 
YES you are still wrong
 
Kane

-----Original Message-----
From: ViLLaN [mailto:villain@...tonic.com] 
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:42 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure


No one is denying that Spamassasin is in use, they are saying that the
section of the header showing the path (what your original post was about
from what I understood), is Interscan, not Spamassasin..  
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: morning_wood [mailto:se_cur_ity@...mail.com] 
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:25 AM
To: ViLLaN; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure


sigh
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-Versi
on%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google+Search>
&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-Version%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google+Sea
rch
 
 
1. http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computer.help/policy/spam_filtering.html
<http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computer.help/policy/spam_filtering.html> 
2. http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2003-Apr/0554.html
3. http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_PerMsgStatus.html
<http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_PerMsgStatus.html> 
4. http://lpsc.in2p3.fr/informatique/faq/spamassassin.html
<http://lpsc.in2p3.fr/informatique/faq/spamassassin.html> 
5. http://www.unit.liu.se/irt/epost/spamassassin.html
<http://www.unit.liu.se/irt/epost/spamassassin.html> 
 
still wrong?
 
Donnie Werner
co-cofounder - Chief Technical Officer
e2-labs Pvt Ltd
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 

From: ViLLaN <mailto:villain@...tonic.com>  
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
<mailto:full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>  
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure


Kane is correct... Interscan viruswall is responsible for that quarantine.. 





CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient,please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030825/769951d3/attachment.html