full-disclosure - GOOD: A legal fix for software flaws?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: GOOD: A legal fix for software flaws? 

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:57:29 PDT, dhtml@...h.com  said:

> We need to hear more of this type of noise. Unleash the repo man on the
> puppy mill owner and his cohorts.
> 
> http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-5067873.html?tag=fd_lede2_hed
> 
> A legal fix for software flaws?

Nope.

Targeting Microsoft may be a tempting idea, but it's fiendishly difficult to write the
laws such that Microsoft can be sued and the average open-source vendor can't.

And quite frankly, Microsoft has lawyers to fight lawsuits, and the open source
community doesn't.

You think things are bad *now*, imagine the scenario where Apache, Linux, the
various *BSD's, and almost everything under the GPL all disappear - none of those
have armies of lawyers to defend them. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030827/2142e321/attachment.bin