[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Law11-OE56pYjooc07M00004b34@hotmail.com>
From: se_cur_ity at hotmail.com (morning_wood)
Subject: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect
if the worm was active in anticipation of a patch that intoduced a new exploit
vector and it took advantage of that, is'nt the vendor ( microsoft ) to blame
then? As well there was plenty of advanced warning on this exploit long before
msblast was an issue. It seems to me that it is each admins responsiblity, if
they were affected ( infected ) not the coder. if this were the case the
LastStage(of)Delerium would be the blamed party for developing and releasing the
exploit, but alas.. they are not of USA orgin.
SUE LITIGATE BLAME PROCECUTE
as long as the general public remains uneducated ( and many Fortune500 admins)
we will continue
to see this type of action against coders for blame, not the people actualy
responsible for allowing
thier infrastructure to become targets in the first place. im sure this
ignorance is a byproduct of
the weak mind of most Americans as they are in a constant state to blame other
for thier own
problems, this can be seen everywhere in todays American society...
commonly refered as to the "poor me" syndrome..
Q. why did you murder the victim?
A. my father never told me he loved me
( real answer - you pulled the triger )
Q. why was my network compromised?
A. because of someone else
( real answer - you suck at internet )
muh 2 bytes,
morning_wood
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Ballowe" <hangman-fulldisclosure@...elballs.org>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:14:51PM -0000, 00005702@...id.com wrote:
> >
> > And this kid is dumb enough be be living in the U.S.A. man, when are
> > people going to learn, next we will here that he has been charged with
> > every penny the worm caused and will be sentence under the new and ever
> > improving Terrorist act.
> >
> Interesting -- the net cost of the worm is actually a net $0.00. For every
> penny that a company chalks up as a cost to the worm, some other company
> must be chalking up the cost as a profit from the worm.
>
> -Charlie
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists