full-disclosure - Virus, whether the scanners say so or not?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030901155910.GA12955@rahul.net>
From: bet at rahul.net (Bennett Todd)
Subject: Virus, whether the scanners say so or not?

2003-09-01T09:09:01 Scott Phelps / Dreamwright Studios:
> I just got this from a co-workers computer. I've run it against 4
> virus scanners I have around (after running each one's definition
> update) and nothing recognized it.

Clamav caught it.

-Bennett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030901/392a7959/attachment.bin